tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2664850319166330515.post7764221350751267415..comments2024-03-18T01:00:57.108+05:30Comments on Seek truth from facts: On why the Asianet-C Fore got it wrong with opinion pollsR. Ramakumarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04712323842923650748noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2664850319166330515.post-65223217386321502722011-05-12T17:50:24.285+05:302011-05-12T17:50:24.285+05:30@anonymous
Interesting; thanks.@anonymous<br /><br />Interesting; thanks.R. Ramakumarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04712323842923650748noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2664850319166330515.post-91956354184536764132011-05-12T10:25:36.991+05:302011-05-12T10:25:36.991+05:30Well i dont agree with the fact asianet post poll ...Well i dont agree with the fact asianet post poll got it right.<br /><br />to make my case i will take BJP votes.<br />According to asianet,<br />BJP 10% vote <br />9% ehavas , 3% Dalit 17% Hindu upper<br />20% other Hindu OBC, 0% christians and muslims.<br /><br />There are 56 % Hindus let us suppose Asianet sample had 60% due to sampling error.<br />To get 10% from 60% BJP need 16.67 or 17% Hindu vote. Ezhavas and Dalits form more than half the Hindus . With just 3 and 9 % from they need 30% from other Hindus to get total 17%.<br /><br />Analysing this i come to conclusion that :<br />a) Oversampling of Hindus to the tune of 65%<br />Or<br />b) Oversampling of other Hindu OBC and Upper caste <br />Or <br />c) both<br />Plus CPM getting 47 % muslim vote, plus USF getting only 14 seats from ksgd to Malappuram make Asianet Unscientific.<br />CSDS i feel is the nost scientific survey .<br />Lets wait till tommorow for the truthAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com